Tuesday, 1 December 2015

Wendy Williams Displays Her Massive Boobs at The Beach {Must See Photos}


Raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!!! Hot legs too!

Last month, Wendy William revealed she lost 50 pounds of weight and she also shared her get fit tips with viewers of her show. She attributed her healthy lifestyle to “lots of cardio” and “Pilates,” plus, a meat-free diet.
But what is breaking the internet now are these candid photos of Wendy captured at a beach in Florida. While I think Wendy looks good in that swim suit, others think that for someone who spends  all her time bashing other people, much is expected from her in the looks department.
Some even went as far as saying she forgot to iron her legs before hitting the beach......SMH.
More pictures of Wendy and some of the comments I munched from the internet;
    Beach body: Wendy Williams showed off her over 50 pound weight loss in Bal Harbour, Florida, on Saturday
    Fantastic physique: The 51-year-old looked amazing in a vintage-inspired black ruched one piece which was perfect for displaying the talk show's host now much slenderer legs and tiny waist
    Beach bling: The talk show host may have been at the beach but she was not about to tone down the glamour wearing her bathing suit with a matching ruched skirt, multiple diamond rings and bracelets as well as  a diamond bow in her hair



















Lol!!! How are you doing Wendy!
0

Sad Story: This Lady’s Rape Ordeal Will Give You Goose Bumps


This comment on Sisi Yemmie’s Blog on a post she did on the Sugabelly case has now gone viral. This lady is anonymous, and didn’t mention names so she has no reason to lie. Rape is real. We need to stop stigmatizing and be more empathetic towards rape victims.

0

7 Types Of Phone Users

There are different types of phone users based on how they get a new phone and how the use it. and these set of people are....

1. I see, I like, I buy!
These set of people just buy any phone, anyhow, anytime, any amount. Based on "that's what is trending now" or they just like the phone when they saw it. Today iPhone 6, tomorrow galaxy s6 edge, next tomorrow Blackberry priv.

2. Annual Upgrade
These set of people have one particular brand of phone they use. They just buy a new version of it once its out. And use it till the next version is out. Is this set of people you find on queue waiting for sales to begin on the next version "iphone" especially. I still don't see why I go line up for days just because I wan buy the latest iphone.

3. Bi-annual upgrade
These set of people don't buy latest flagships, they buy flagships of 2 years old. For example, when galaxy s5 came out, my friend bought s3, now there is s6, he is using s4.

4. Team london used
These set of people don't buy new phones, they prefer to buy refurbished phones or 2nd hand. And most times they buy phones irregularly, any time they enter market, they swap of sell their current phone and buy another 2nd hand phone. If you mention say you like their phone, the next thing they go tell you is "you wan buy am? Na for sale o!"

5. Phone Gift
These set of people don't even buy phones. The phone they use were given to them as a gift, and they would use that phone till the next "phone Gift" arrives..and their phone dey hardly lost or spoil...cos na gift so they go dey carry the phone like egg. People that won their phone in a contest also falls here

6. Heritage
These set of people don't also buy phones, they collect ex-phones from their parents or uncle/aunty. Also people that fall here are those who just go home and pick any phone lying around that no one is using, clean and use. Una know yourself. You don dey eye your uncle s6 edge Because say e be "annual upgrade" and s7 dey launch February.

7. Maximum output
These set of people buy phone once, and use the phone till it develops fault or get stolen or just lost or it becomes completely unusable before they consider buying another. Some of them, you have to beg them.."Oga, you still dey use this phone? This you phone don try na, abeg buy new one"
0

Russia Sends Nuclear War Signals To Turkey

 
After striking Turkey and Egypt off the list of safe tourist destinations, Russia has decided to remove India as well, according to The Times of India. And while the reason for eliminating Turkey and Egypt is crystal clear, removing India from the list is not fully comprehended in the current geopolitics.

Amid warming relations between New Delhi and Moscow and their joint naval exercises to be held from Dec. 7-12, many wonder why Russian President Vladimir Putin would weaken India’s economy by removing it from Russia’s list of safe destinations for tourists.

Putin cancelled all flights to Egypt after the Oct. 31 explosion of a Russian passenger plane, which killed 224 people on board. And after the Turkish military shot down a Russian fighter jet in its airspace last Tuesday, the Russian president wiped out Russia’s tourist relations with Turkey, where 4.4 million Russians vacationed last year.

“This is extremely bad news for our tour operators. The flow of Russian tourists was expected to increase following the bombing a Russian plane (resulting in the suspension of Russian flights to Egypt) and the easing of visa restrictions,” Subhash Goyal, president of the Indian Association of Tour Operators, told the Pakistan Observer.

Russia set to strengthen China’s economy with tourists

India’s Goa has always been a favorite place for Russian tourists, according to Rajji Rai, former president of the Travel Agents Association of India and chairman of Swift Travels.

“Such is the demand that last year, Air India resumed its Moscow flight after a gap of around 15 years. Around 50% of tourists visiting Goa in winters are Russians,” he added.

Russians mean good business for India’s travel industry, he said and added that “they stay here for an average 3-6 months and are an integral part of the travel industry here.”

Moscow officials stated out that the removal of India from the safe travelling list was not connected to terror attacks. In what appears to be a move to strengthen China’s economy, Russia is now going to focus on China, Cuba and Vietnam as new directions for tourist flow as they “have excellent infrastructure, friendly atmosphere and warm weather in winter,” according to First Deputy Speaker of the Parliament of the Russian Federation Ivan Melnikov.

“Unfortunately, both India and Goa, were not discussed as a promising direction for Russian travelers,” Melnikov said, as reported by The Times of India.
Russia imposes visa regime on Turkey

On Friday, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov announced that Russia is introducing a visa regime for Turkish citizens. The regime goes into effect Jan. 1, according to The Guardian.

Moscow has also warned all of its tour companies against selling vacation packages to Turkey and recommended that all Russian citizens leave the country that downed the Russian warplane last week. Additionally, it is expected that Putin is going to impose a number of economic sanctions and cancel joint projects in a bid to further cripple the Turkish economy.

The Turkish military said it had shot down the Russian fighter jet on Tuesday, triggering a furious response from the Kremlin and escalating the already-hot tensions in geopolitics. The Russian warplane was given ten warnings in five minutes as it approached the NATO member state’s territory. After the Russian Su-24 attack aircraft ignored the warnings, the Turkish military sent two of its F-16s to bring down the Russian jet.

With Putin warning the West of “serious consequences” for bringing down the Russian warplane, analysts believe Moscow is willing to unleash a nuclear war over the incident. Although Turkey is backed by NATO’s 5th Article, which states that an attack on one Ally shall be considered an attack on all NATO members, the chances that Russia is going start a nuclear war over the incident are very “likely,” according to Pavel Felgengauer, Russia’s most respected military analyst, as reported by ValueWalk.

Russia can easily destroy Turkey with nuclear bomb: Russian MP
A Russian MP has recently outlined how easy it would be for Russia to destroy Turkey.

“You just chuck one nuclear bomb into the straits, and there’d be a huge flood. The water would rise by 10-15 meters and the whole city would disappear,” said Vladimir Zhirinovsky, leader of the misnamed Liberal Democratic party, according to the Daily Mail.

It was also reported by the British news source that Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has refused to apologize to Moscow for the downing of the Russian warplane. He said that his country’s jets would act the exact same way if a similar situation ever occurred again. The words triggered furious rhetoric at the Kremlin.

The Turkish president also said on Friday that he had warned Putin about violations of Turkish airspace by Russian planes at the G20 summit in Antalya earlier this month. Erdogan said that Putin had told him to accept Russian warplanes “as guests,” to which the Turkish president responded that his country is not going to accept uninvited guests.Erdogan added during a speech in Bayburt that Russia is “playing with fire to go as far as mistreating our citizens who have gone to Russia.”

“We really attach a lot of importance to our relations with Russia … We don’t want these relations to suffer harm in any way,” he said.

The Turkish president also accused Putin of backing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s “terrorist state” in Syria. The comments come after Putin called the Turks, including Erdogan, “accomplices of terrorists” and claimed that Turkish officials were profiting from oil trade with ISIS, which claimed responsibility for the downing of a Russian passenger plane on Oct. 31.

Erdogan has previously said that the Turkish jets which were ordered to bring down the Russian Su-24 last Tuesday did not realize the jet was a Russian jet and would have acted differently had they known.




0

The Six Types Of Atheists That Exist

First things first: While atheists have a public image
of being dogmatic and belligerent—an image that
famous atheists like Bill Maher only end up
reinforcing—researchers found that to absolutely not
be true. Only 15 percent of non-believers even fit in
the category of those who actively seek out
religious people to argue with, and the subset that
are dogmatic about it are probably even smaller
than that. But that doesn’t mean that the majority
of non-believers are just sitting around, twiddling
their thumbs and not letting atheism affect their
worldview. On the contrary, researchers found that
the majority of non-believers take some kind of
action in the world to promote humanism, atheism
or secularism. Here is a breakdown of the types.


1. Intellectual Atheist/Agnostic. By far, the most
common kind of non-believer, at nearly 38 percent.
This group enjoys intellectual discourse, and while
they’re often very certain about their beliefs, they’re
not belligerent about it. These types often get
mistaken for dogmatic atheists, however, because
they have a tendency to join skeptic’s groups or
otherwise find avenues to discuss non-belief with
others. However, as researchers note, these non-
believers “associate with fellow intellectuals
regardless of the other’s ontological position,” so
long as their friends “versed and educated on
various issues of science, philosophy, ‘rational’
theology, and common socio-political religious
dialog.” They like debating religion, but aren’t
particularly interested in chasing down believers to
give them a hard time.


2. Activist. This group also gets commonly
accused of being dogmatic, but like the intellectual
atheist, while they’re firm in their beliefs, they’re
intellectually flexible and don’t prioritize attacking
believers. Instead, they are motivated by a strong
sense of humanist values to make change in the
world, often making related issues—such as
feminism, gay rights, or the environment—a priority
over simply advocating atheism. This group also
advocates for a better, more egalitarian atheist
community, according to researchers: “They seek to
be both vocal and proactive regarding current
issues in the atheist and/or agnostic socio-political
sphere." Because of this, they unfortunately attract
a lot of abuse from a small but vocal minority of
atheists who disapprove of linking secularism with
larger social justice issues, but they do have the
numbers on their side. They are the second biggest
sub-category of non-believers, making up 23
percent of non-believers.


3. Seeker-Agnostic. This group, which makes up
7.6 percent of non-believers, are unlikely to be as
critical of religion as most other groups. They
prioritize not-knowingness. If you ever come across
people saying, “I don’t know, but neither do you!”
regarding religious belief, you’re dealing with a
seeker-agnostic. They don’t really believe in
anything, but they are uncomfortable committing to
non-belief completely. They routinely get accused of
intellectual cowardice by atheists, but researchers
defend them, saying, “For the Seeker-Agnostic,
uncertainty is embraced.”


4. Anti-Theist. This group tends to get conflated
with all atheists by believers, but they only
constitute 15 percent of non-believers. Like the
Intellectual Atheists, they like to argue about
religion, but they are much more aggressive about it
and actively seek out religious people in an effort to
disabuse them of their beliefs. While most atheists
limit themselves to supporting a more secular
society, anti-theists tend to view ending religion as
the real goal. While plenty are aggressively angry,
researchers point out this isn’t necessarily a bad
thing: “For example, many of the Antitheist typology
had responded as recently deconverted from
religious belief or socially displeased with the status
quo, especially in high social tension-based
geographies such as the Southeastern United
States,” and being combative with believers might
help them establish their own sense of self and
right to non-belief.


5. Non-Theist. They don’t believe in any gods, but
don’t think about those who do very often. In such a
religious society, simply opting out of caring much
about religion one way or another is nearly
impossible, which is why this group is only 4.4
percent of non-believers. “A Non-Theist simply does
not concern him or herself with religion,”
researchers explain. In some skeptical/atheist
circles, this group is disparagingly referred to as
“shruggies," because they simply shrug when asked
their opinion on religion. However, some quite likely
are indifferent because they’re fortunate enough to
live in a bubble where belief doesn’t matter one way
or another.


6. Ritual Atheist/Agnostic . While you might think
the anti-theist is the non-believer type that scares
Christians the most, it turns out that it may very
well be the Ritual Atheist/Agnostic. This group,
making up 12.5 percent of atheists, doesn’t really
believe in the supernatural, but they do believe in
the community aspects of their religious tradition
enough to continue participating. We’re not just
talking about atheists who happen to have a
Christmas tree, but who tend to align themselves
with a religious tradition even while professing no
belief. “Such participation may be related to an
ethnic identity (e.g. Jewish),” explain researchers,
“or the perceived utility of such practices in making
the individual a better person." The Christian Post
clearly found this group most alarming, titling their
coverage of this study “Researchers: 'Ritual'
Atheists and Agnostics Could Be Sitting Next to You
in Church,” and giving the first few paragraphs over
to concern that people in your very own
congregation may not actually believe in your god.
The atheism, it seems, might be coming from inside
the house (of God).
While a lot of non-believers don’t really do much
when it comes to acting on their non-belief, for
those who are trying to create a more organized
atheist community that takes up activism and offers
community, there is plenty of reason to hope. The
Intellectual, the Activist and the Anti-theist all, to
one extent or another, discuss their non-belief with
others or let their non-belief have significant impact
on their activities. Taken together, they make up
nearly three-quarters of non-believers. That’s a big
group that has a lot in common, and perhaps that
energy could be harnessed as a force of good.
0